Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z-ai

GPT-5 Codex vs GLM-5V Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5V Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5 Codex
Speed
GPT-5 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 CodexGLM-5V Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 CodexGLM-5V Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedSep 2025Apr 2026

GPT-5 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM-5V Turbo Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 Codex with:

Compare GLM-5V Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5V Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. GLM-5V Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
GPT-5 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.9, compared to GLM-5V Turbo's score of 36.2.
GPT-5 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while GLM-5V Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
GPT-5 Codex supports vision. GLM-5V Turbo supports vision.