Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Xiaomi

GPT-5 Nano vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5 NanoMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.09 GPT-5 Nano
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)$5000.00$45000.00 GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-5 Nano is 2% cheaper overall.

GPT-5 Nano Providers

OpenAI $0.05 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.05 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
4
GPT-5 Nano Wins
2
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.730.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
20.325.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
83.767.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
78.074.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.665.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
78.940.2
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5 Nano
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5 NanoMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second141.5 tok/s142.6 tok/s-
Time to First Token110.10s1.25s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 NanoMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 NanoMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIXiaomi
ReleasedAug 2025Dec 2025

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5 Nano has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to GPT-5 Nano's score of 20.3.
GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5 Nano supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.