Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z-ai

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Speed
GLM-5 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Max with:

Compare GLM-5 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max's score of N/A.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has a 400,000 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max supports vision. GLM-5 Turbo does not support vision.