Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Xiaomi

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIXiaomi
ReleasedNov 2025Unknown

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's score of 36.4.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a 400,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.