Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Sao10k

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1-CodexLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.1-CodexLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAISao10k
ReleasedNov 2025Aug 2024

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.85/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.85/M tokens.
GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has a 32,768 token context window.
GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 does not support vision.