Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Stepfun-ai

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2-CodexStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2-CodexStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIStepfun-ai
ReleasedJan 2026Jan 2026

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Step 3.5 Flash's score of 31.6.
GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.