Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Sao10k

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.65 Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.75 Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 99% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.85
Novita $1.48

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.2--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.3--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.9--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Winner
Tokens/second98.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token46.57sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAISao10k
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2024

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.65/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2's score of N/A.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has a 32,768 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 does not support vision.