Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Xiaomi

GPT-5.2 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.09 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$45000.00 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 100% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.230.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.725.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.067.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.474.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.365.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.940.2
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second98.3 tok/s142.6 tok/s
Time to First Token46.57s1.25s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 45% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIXiaomi
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's score of 25.8.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.