Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z-ai

GPT-5.2 Pro vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProGLM-4.7-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.07 GLM-4.7-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.40 GLM-4.7-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$10000.00 GLM-4.7-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GLM-4.7-Flash is 100% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

GLM-4.7-Flash Providers

Z.AI $0.07 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.07 (Cheapest)
Phala $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
GLM-4.7-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProGLM-4.7-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.2--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.3--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.9--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GLM-4.7-Flash
200,000
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProGLM-4.7-FlashWinner
Tokens/second99.7 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token27.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Jan 2026

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare GLM-4.7-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of N/A.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 200,000 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. GLM-4.7-Flash does not support vision.