Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Opengvlab
Opengvlab

GPT-5.3 Codex vs InternVL3 78B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
InternVL3 78B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexInternVL3 78B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexInternVL3 78B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIOpengvlab
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare InternVL3 78B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

InternVL3 78B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. InternVL3 78B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to InternVL3 78B's score of N/A.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. InternVL3 78B supports vision.