Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Sao10k

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Euryale 70B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAISao10k
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2024

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has cheaper input pricing at $0.65/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B's score of N/A.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has a 131,072 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B does not support vision.