Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Fireworks
Fireworks

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Sarvam M

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Sarvam M wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Sarvam M
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexSarvam M
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexSarvam M
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIFireworks
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Sarvam M Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare Sarvam M with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Sarvam M has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Sarvam M has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Sarvam M's score of 7.5.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Sarvam M has a 8,192 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Sarvam M does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.