Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z-ai

GPT-OSS-120b vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
GLM-4.7-Flash
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-120bGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-120bGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedAug 2025Jan 2026

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.5, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
GPT-OSS-120b supports vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.