Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-OSS-20b vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

92 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-20b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-20b
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
GPT-OSS-20b

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-OSS-20bQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.22 GPT-OSS-20b
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.14$1.00 GPT-OSS-20b
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-OSS-20b is 86% cheaper overall.

GPT-OSS-20b Providers

DeepInfra $0.03 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.04
Novita $0.04
NCompass $0.04
Clarifai $0.04

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
GPT-OSS-20b Wins
2
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-OSS-20bQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
24.524.8-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.524.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
89.339.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
74.878.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.861.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
77.758.5
AIME
Competition math
-47.7-
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-OSS-20b
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-OSS-20b
131,072
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-OSS-20bQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second321.8 tok/s47.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.45s1.64s
GPT-OSS-20b responds 578% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-20bQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-20bQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-OSS-20b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-OSS-20b with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-20b has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GPT-OSS-20b has cheaper output pricing at $0.14/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to GPT-OSS-20b's score of 18.5.
GPT-OSS-20b has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-OSS-20b does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.