Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z-ai

o3 vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

o3 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
o3
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
o3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

Featureo3GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

Propertyo3GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedApr 2025Mar 2026

o3 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare o3 with:

Compare GLM-5 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.4, compared to GLM-5 Turbo's score of 36.8.
o3 has a 200,000 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
o3 supports vision. GLM-5 Turbo does not support vision.