Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Opengvlab
Opengvlab
vs
X
Xiaomi

InternVL3 78B vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Learn More →

Key Takeaways

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
InternVL3 78B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
InternVL3 78B
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureInternVL3 78BMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyInternVL3 78BMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorOpengvlabXiaomi

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare InternVL3 78B with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

InternVL3 78B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. InternVL3 78B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to InternVL3 78B's score of N/A.
InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
InternVL3 78B supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.