Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Speed
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.09 Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.34$1.10 Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 64% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 Providers

Cloudflare $0.05 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.08
SiliconFlow $0.09
Nebius $0.10
Alibaba $0.13

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.09 (Cheapest)
Alibaba $0.10
Parasail $0.10
SiliconFlow $0.14
AtlasCloud $0.15

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 Wins
0
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-23.7-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-15.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-66.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-81.9-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-73.8-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-68.4-
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
32,768
tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A131.2 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.09s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2025

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 with:

Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.34/M tokens.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.3, compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's score of N/A.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 does not support vision. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct does not support vision.