Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3.5-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Qwen3.5-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3.5-FlashMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.09 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.04 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 20% cheaper overall.

Qwen3.5-Flash Providers

Alibaba $0.10 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3.5-Flash Wins
0
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-30.4-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-25.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-67.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-74.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-65.6-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-40.2-
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3.5-Flash
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash has a 74% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3.5-FlashMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/secondN/A140.9 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.16s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5-FlashMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5-FlashMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Qwen3.5-Flash Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3.5-Flash with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3.5-Flash's score of N/A.
Qwen3.5-Flash has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3.5-Flash supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.