Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Reka
vs
Stepfun-ai

Reka Flash 3 vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Reka Flash 3 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Reka Flash 3
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Reka Flash 3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureReka Flash 3Step 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyReka Flash 3Step 3.5 Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorRekaStepfun-ai
ReleasedMar 2025Jan 2026

Reka Flash 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Reka Flash 3 with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Reka Flash 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Reka Flash 3 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Reka Flash 3's score of 8.9.
Reka Flash 3 has a 65,536 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Reka Flash 3 does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.