Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Relace
vs
Xiaomi

Relace Apply 3 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Relace Apply 3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Relace Apply 3
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Relace Apply 3
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureRelace Apply 3MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyRelace Apply 3MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorRelaceXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Unknown

Relace Apply 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Relace Apply 3 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Relace Apply 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.85/M tokens. Relace Apply 3 has cheaper output pricing at $1.25/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Relace Apply 3's score of N/A.
Relace Apply 3 has a 256,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Relace Apply 3 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.