Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Relace
vs
Z-ai

Relace Apply 3 vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Relace Apply 3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Relace Apply 3
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
Relace Apply 3
Speed
GLM-5 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureRelace Apply 3GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyRelace Apply 3GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorRelaceZ-ai
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 2026

Relace Apply 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Relace Apply 3 with:

Compare GLM-5 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Relace Apply 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.85/M tokens. Relace Apply 3 has cheaper output pricing at $1.25/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Relace Apply 3's score of N/A.
Relace Apply 3 has a 256,000 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
Relace Apply 3 does not support vision. GLM-5 Turbo does not support vision.