Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Sao10k
vs
Sao10k

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 vs Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 wins:

  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1
Context Window
Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorSao10kSao10k
ReleasedJun 2024Jan 2025

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 with:

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $1.48/M tokens. Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.48/M tokens.
Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1's score of N/A.
Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 has a 8,192 token context window, while Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 has a 16,000 token context window.
Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 does not support vision. Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 does not support vision.