Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Sao10k
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorSao10kXiaomi
ReleasedAug 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.85/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has a 32,768 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.