Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
S
Stepfun-ai
vs
Tencent
Tencent

Step 3.5 Flash vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute— We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Hunyuan A13B Instruct wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureStep 3.5 FlashHunyuan A13B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyStep 3.5 FlashHunyuan A13B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorStepfun-aiTencent
ReleasedJan 2026Jul 2025

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Hunyuan A13B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Compare Hunyuan A13B Instruct with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Hunyuan A13B Instruct's score of N/A.
Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window, while Hunyuan A13B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision. Hunyuan A13B Instruct does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.