Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Thedrummer
vs
Thedrummer

Rocinante 12B vs Skyfall 36B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Rocinante 12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports tool calls

Skyfall 36B V2 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Rocinante 12B
Benchmark Advantage
Rocinante 12B
Context Window
Skyfall 36B V2
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureRocinante 12BSkyfall 36B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyRocinante 12BSkyfall 36B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorThedrummerThedrummer
ReleasedSep 2024Mar 2025

Rocinante 12B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Skyfall 36B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Rocinante 12B with:

Compare Skyfall 36B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Rocinante 12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.17/M tokens. Rocinante 12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.43/M tokens.
Rocinante 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Skyfall 36B V2's score of N/A.
Rocinante 12B has a 32,768 token context window, while Skyfall 36B V2 has a 32,768 token context window.
Rocinante 12B does not support vision. Skyfall 36B V2 does not support vision.