Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
Fireworks
Fireworks

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo vs Sarvam M

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo wins:

  • Supports tool calls

Sarvam M wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
Sarvam M
Context Window
Sarvam M
Speed
Sarvam M

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito v1 Preview Llama 70B TurboSarvam M
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito v1 Preview Llama 70B TurboSarvam M
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepcogitoFireworks

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo Modalities

Input
Output

Sarvam M Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo with:

Compare Sarvam M with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Sarvam M scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 7.5, compared to Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo's score of N/A.
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo has a unknown token context window, while Sarvam M has a 8,192 token context window.
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo does not support vision. Sarvam M does not support vision.