Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Xiaomi
vs
Z-ai

MiMo-V2-Flash vs GLM 4 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

GLM 4 32B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiMo-V2-FlashGLM 4 32BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.09$0.10 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.29$0.10 GLM 4 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)$45000.00N/A MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GLM 4 32B is 29% cheaper overall.

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

GLM 4 32B Providers

Z.AI $0.10 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins
0
GLM 4 32B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashGLM 4 32BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
30.6--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
25.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
67.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
74.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
65.6--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.2--
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiMo-V2-Flash
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
GLM 4 32B
128,000
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 51% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiMo-V2-FlashGLM 4 32BWinner
Tokens/second142.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.25sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiMo-V2-FlashGLM 4 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiMo-V2-FlashGLM 4 32B
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorXiaomiZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Compare GLM 4 32B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. GLM 4 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to GLM 4 32B's score of N/A.
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 4 32B has a 128,000 token context window.
MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision. GLM 4 32B does not support vision.