Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Xiaomi
vs
Z-ai

MiMo-V2-Flash vs GLM-5V Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5V Turbo wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiMo-V2-FlashGLM-5V Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiMo-V2-FlashGLM-5V Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorXiaomiZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5V Turbo Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
GLM-5V Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.2, compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's score of 25.8.
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM-5V Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision. GLM-5V Turbo supports vision.