Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Xiaomi
vs
Z-ai

MiMo v2 Omni vs GLM 4.6V

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM 4.6V wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
GLM 4.6V
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
GLM 4.6V

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiMo v2 OmniGLM 4.6V
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiMo v2 OmniGLM 4.6V
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorXiaomiZ-ai
ReleasedMar 2026Dec 2025

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

GLM 4.6V Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.6V has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. GLM 4.6V has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to GLM 4.6V's score of 11.1.
MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 4.6V has a 131,072 token context window.
MiMo v2 Omni supports vision. GLM 4.6V supports vision.