Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Xiaomi
vs
Z-ai

MiMo v2 Omni vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision

GLM 5 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
GLM 5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiMo v2 OmniGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiMo v2 OmniGLM 5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorXiaomiZ-ai
ReleasedMar 2026Feb 2026

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Compare GLM 5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to MiMo v2 Omni's score of 35.5.
MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
MiMo v2 Omni supports vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.