Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Z-ai
vs
Z-ai

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 4.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

112 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GLM 4.6V wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

GLM 4.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GLM 4.6V
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 4.7
Context Window
GLM 4.7
Speed
GLM 4.7

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGLM 4.6VGLM 4.7Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.38 GLM 4.6V
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$1.75 GLM 4.6V
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.05$0.08 GLM 4.6V
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GLM 4.6V is 38% cheaper overall.

GLM 4.6V Providers

No provider data available

GLM 4.7 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
GLM 4.6V Wins
6
GLM 4.7 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGLM 4.6VGLM 4.7Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.134.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
11.132.0
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
26.348.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
75.279.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
56.666.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
41.156.2
GLM 4.7 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GLM 4.6V
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GLM 4.6V
131,072
tokens
GLM 4.7
202,752
tokens
GLM 4.7 has a 35% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGLM 4.6VGLM 4.7Winner
Tokens/second22.9 tok/s85.9 tok/s
Time to First Token4.51s0.68s
GLM 4.7 responds 275% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGLM 4.6VGLM 4.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGLM 4.6VGLM 4.7
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorZ-aiZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025

GLM 4.6V Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

GLM 4.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GLM 4.6V with:

Compare GLM 4.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.6V has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. GLM 4.6V has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GLM 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.0, compared to GLM 4.6V's score of 11.1.
GLM 4.6V has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM 4.7 has a 202,752 token context window.
GLM 4.6V supports vision. GLM 4.7 does not support vision.