Key Takeaways
GLM 5 wins:
- Larger context window
- Faster response time
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
zero-one-ai/Yi-34B wins:
- Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
zero-one-ai/Yi-34B
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
GLM 5
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | GLM 5 | zero-one-ai/Yi-34B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.80 | $0.80 | Tie |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $2.55 | $0.80 | zero-one-ai/Yi-34B |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | $0.16 | N/A | GLM 5 |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, zero-one-ai/Yi-34B is 35% cheaper overall.
GLM 5 Providers
No provider data available
zero-one-ai/Yi-34B Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
3
Benchmarks Compared
0
GLM 5 Wins
0
zero-one-ai/Yi-34B Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | zero-one-ai/Yi-34B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | 40.6 | - | - |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | 39.0 | - | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | 66.6 | - | - |
GLM 5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
GLM 5
202,752
tokens
zero-one-ai/Yi-34B
N/A
tokens
Speed Performance
| Metric | GLM 5 | zero-one-ai/Yi-34B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | 47.5 tok/s | N/A | |
| Time to First Token | 1.20s | N/A |
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GLM 5 | zero-one-ai/Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | GLM 5 | zero-one-ai/Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Author | Z-ai | Zero One Ai |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Unknown |
GLM 5 Modalities
Input
text
Output
text
zero-one-ai/Yi-34B Modalities
Input
Output