Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Olmo 2 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Olmo 2 32B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Olmo 2 32B Instruct
Context Window
Olmo 2 32B Instruct
Speed
Olmo 2 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 37% cheaper overall.

Olmo 2 32B Instruct Providers

Cirrascale $0.05 (Cheapest)

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
2
Olmo 2 32B Instruct Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.635.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
2.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
3.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
51.136.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
32.85.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
6.8--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Olmo 2 32B Instruct wins 2 out of 7 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Olmo 2 32B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Olmo 2 32B Instruct
128,000
tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Olmo 2 32B Instruct has a 74% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiQwen
ReleasedMar 2025Oct 2024

Olmo 2 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Olmo 2 32B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 2.7, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.