Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Olmo 3 32B Think vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Olmo 3 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026

Olmo 3 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Olmo 3 32B Think's score of 10.5.
Olmo 3 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Olmo 3 32B Think does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.