Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Olmo 3 32B Think vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 482 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Olmo 3 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5-27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.20 Olmo 3 32B Think
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.50$1.56 Olmo 3 32B Think
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.27 Qwen3.5-27B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Olmo 3 32B Think is 56% cheaper overall.

Olmo 3 32B Think Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5-27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Olmo 3 32B Think Wins
3
Qwen3.5-27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5-27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.137.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.533.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
73.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
75.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
61.084.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
67.2--
Qwen3.5-27B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Olmo 3 32B Think
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Olmo 3 32B Think
65,536
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5-27BWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s89.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.32s
Qwen3.5-27B responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3 32B ThinkQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026

Olmo 3 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Olmo 3 32B Think with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Olmo 3 32B Think's score of 10.5.
Olmo 3 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Olmo 3 32B Think does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.
Advertise with us