Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Amazon
Amazon
vs
Google
Google

Nova Lite 1.0 vs Gemma 2 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Nova Lite 1.0 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Nova Lite 1.0
Context Window
Nova Lite 1.0
Speed
Nova Lite 1.0

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNova Lite 1.0Gemma 2 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNova Lite 1.0Gemma 2 9B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAmazonGoogle
ReleasedDec 2024Jun 2024

Nova Lite 1.0 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nova Lite 1.0 with:

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
Nova Lite 1.0 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 5.1, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Nova Lite 1.0 has a 300,000 token context window, while Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window.
Nova Lite 1.0 supports vision. Gemma 2 9B supports vision.