Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Google
Google

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedFeb 2026Jun 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $10.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's score of 31.9.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision.