Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct's score of 7.2.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.