Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper output pricing at $2.08/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's score of 31.6.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.