Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Arliai
Arliai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

QwQ 32B RpR v1 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

QwQ 32B RpR v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
QwQ 32B RpR v1
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwQ 32B RpR v1GPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwQ 32B RpR v1GPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorArliaiOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

QwQ 32B RpR v1 Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

QwQ 32B RpR v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. QwQ 32B RpR v1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
QwQ 32B RpR v1 has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
QwQ 32B RpR v1 does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.