Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Austism
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Austism/chronos-hermes-13b vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Austism/chronos-hermes-13b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Austism/chronos-hermes-13b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureAustism/chronos-hermes-13bGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyAustism/chronos-hermes-13bGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAustismOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Austism/chronos-hermes-13b Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Austism/chronos-hermes-13b has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Austism/chronos-hermes-13b has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Austism/chronos-hermes-13b has a 4,096 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Austism/chronos-hermes-13b does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.