Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Xiaomi

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Speed
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduXiaomi
ReleasedJun 2025Unknown

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has cheaper input pricing at $0.28/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B's score of 14.5.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.