Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Seed 2.0 Mini vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Seed 2.0 Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Seed 2.0 Mini
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 2.0 MiniQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 2.0 MiniQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorBytedance-seedQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

Seed 2.0 Mini Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 2.0 Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Seed 2.0 Mini has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Seed 2.0 Mini has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Seed 2.0 Mini supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.