Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Seed OSS 36B Instruct vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Seed OSS 36B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Seed OSS 36B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed OSS 36B InstructGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed OSS 36B InstructGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorBytedance-seedOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Seed OSS 36B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed OSS 36B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Seed OSS 36B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Seed OSS 36B Instruct's score of 16.7.
Seed OSS 36B Instruct has a 262,000 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Seed OSS 36B Instruct does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.