Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Google
Google

Command A vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Command A
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand AGemini 3 Pro Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand AGemini 3 Pro Preview
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorCohereGoogle
ReleasedMar 2025Nov 2025

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command A with:

Compare Gemini 3 Pro Preview with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 3 Pro Preview has cheaper input pricing at $2.00/M tokens. Command A has cheaper output pricing at $10.00/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to Command A's score of 9.9.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision.