Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Google
Google

Command A vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Command A
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCommand AGemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 27B is 85% cheaper overall.

Command A Providers

No provider data available

Gemma 2 27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Command A Wins
2
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCommand AGemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.536.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
9.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
13.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.238.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
52.716.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.7--
Aider
Real-world code editing
12.036.1
AIME
Competition math
9.7--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
Command A significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Command A
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Command A
256,000
tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Command A has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCommand AGemma 2 27BWinner
Tokens/second35.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.48sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand AGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand AGemma 2 27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereGoogle
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2024

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command A with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.65/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Command A scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.9, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.