Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Google
Google

Command A vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Command A
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand AGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand AGemma 2 27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereGoogle
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2024

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.65/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.