Key Takeaways
Command R wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
Qwen3.5-27B wins:
- Larger context window
- Faster response time
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
- Supports vision
Price Advantage
Command R
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Command R | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.20 | Command R |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $1.56 | Command R |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | N/A | $0.27 | Qwen3.5-27B |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Command R is 51% cheaper overall.
Command R Providers
No provider data available
Qwen3.5-27B Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
3
Benchmarks Compared
0
Command R Wins
0
Qwen3.5-27B Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | - | 37.2 | - |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | - | 33.4 | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | - | 84.2 | - |
Qwen3.5-27B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
Command R
N/A
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B
262,144
tokens
Speed Performance
| Metric | Command R | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | N/A | 91.3 tok/s | |
| Time to First Token | N/A | 1.31s |
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Command R | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Command R | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Open Source |
| Author | Cohere | Qwen |
| Released | Unknown | Feb 2026 |
Command R Modalities
Input
Output
Qwen3.5-27B Modalities
Input
textimagevideo
Output
text