Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
D
Deepcogito
vs
Google
Google

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B vs Gemma 4 31B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 31B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito v1 Preview Llama 3BGemma 4 31B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito v1 Preview Llama 3BGemma 4 31B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoGoogle
ReleasedUnknownApr 2026

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B Modalities

Input
Output

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B has a 131,072 token context window, while Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 3B does not support vision. Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.