Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito v1 Preview Llama 70BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito v1 Preview Llama 70BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B has a 131,072 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.