Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper input pricing at $0.18/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper output pricing at $0.59/M tokens.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has a 131,072 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.